Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Response to Lydia Davis's "Television"


            Lydia Davis’s short story entitled, “Television,” is an intriguing and insightful contemporary work.  The story follows a typical family and their particular relationships with various shows and networks on television.  Each character tends to have their own perception of the television.  For example, the mother has a crush on the anchorman, and the father can’t wait for the cameraman to reveal the young reporter’s dress.  The narrator uses the word “we” quite a bit.  This strategy both integrates the perspective of the family and reaches beyond to address a broader audience, such as middle-class America.  Many times, the narrator purposefully overstates the familial desire for steadfast and convenient lives that are portrayed on cable.  While investing in the programs, the narrator states that, “…we believe in this world.  We believe these people are speaking to us.”
            The structure of the story is done very well.  It is divided up into three sections with the last section being the “sum-up” and conclusion of the story.  The line breaks help the reader adjust and change perspectives as the writer wishes.  “We” changes to “I” as Davis shifts as the narrator loses focus and begins hearing geese outside in which she initially mistakes for another television.
            Davis makes a powerful point in “Television” and includes the very real attitude of American’s wishful thinking.  The desire to retreat into a fictional world is prevalent as Davis explains that they wish to “…skip over all the complications.”  Obviously, this is a feat in which no one can achieve.  “…We want major events,” claims Davis.  It would seem as if the world would be more interesting if it were a drama program.  However, one can miss the beauty of life everyday that surrounds.  Excitement and entertainment is there for people to find, but the willingness to search is weak and concludes to be subservient. 

2 comments:

  1. You said - "“We” changes to “I” as Davis shifts as the narrator loses focus and begins hearing geese outside in which she initially mistakes for another television."

    What did you think of this shift?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I thought it was ironic. Throughout the story, I felt like I needed the narrator to be distracted by something; anything to lead the character away from the television. The fact that the only thing that could come close to drawing the narrator's eyes away from the television was another "television." The moment that she realizes that it is a flock of geese, the point of view switches back from "I" to "we." I love how Davis plays with the concept of individuality and free will in this section. It's subtle, yet hits hard in the grand scheme of "Television."

      Delete