Lydia
Davis’s short story entitled, “Television,” is an intriguing and insightful
contemporary work. The story
follows a typical family and their particular relationships with various shows
and networks on television. Each
character tends to have their own perception of the television. For example, the mother has a crush on
the anchorman, and the father can’t wait for the cameraman to reveal the young
reporter’s dress. The narrator
uses the word “we” quite a bit.
This strategy both integrates the perspective of the family and reaches
beyond to address a broader audience, such as middle-class America. Many times, the narrator purposefully
overstates the familial desire for steadfast and convenient lives that are
portrayed on cable. While
investing in the programs, the narrator states that, “…we believe in this
world. We believe these people are
speaking to us.”
The
structure of the story is done very well.
It is divided up into three sections with the last section being the
“sum-up” and conclusion of the story.
The line breaks help the reader adjust and change perspectives as the
writer wishes. “We” changes to “I”
as Davis shifts as the narrator loses focus and begins hearing geese outside in
which she initially mistakes for another television.
Davis
makes a powerful point in “Television” and includes the very real attitude of
American’s wishful thinking. The
desire to retreat into a fictional world is prevalent as Davis explains that
they wish to “…skip over all the complications.” Obviously, this is a feat in which no one can achieve. “…We want major events,” claims
Davis. It would seem as if the
world would be more interesting if it were a drama program. However, one can miss the beauty of
life everyday that surrounds.
Excitement and entertainment is there for people to find, but the
willingness to search is weak and concludes to be subservient.
You said - "“We” changes to “I” as Davis shifts as the narrator loses focus and begins hearing geese outside in which she initially mistakes for another television."
ReplyDeleteWhat did you think of this shift?
I thought it was ironic. Throughout the story, I felt like I needed the narrator to be distracted by something; anything to lead the character away from the television. The fact that the only thing that could come close to drawing the narrator's eyes away from the television was another "television." The moment that she realizes that it is a flock of geese, the point of view switches back from "I" to "we." I love how Davis plays with the concept of individuality and free will in this section. It's subtle, yet hits hard in the grand scheme of "Television."
Delete